Monthly Archives: February 2006

PBA Ban in Court Again

Posted on by
Justice Life

SCOTUS has decided to hear a case involving the federal Partial Birth Abortion ban. The main argument in the past has focused on the “no health exception” problem.  Here’s a good reason why there’s no health exception in the law.

Why No “Health Exception”? Here’s Why!

If this procedure were done to save the health (or even the life) of the mother, what is the magical thing about leaving the baby’s head in and sucking his brains out — as opposed to delivering him completely and letting him die naturally — that saves the health of the mother? Is it necessary?

No, it’s not. The reason the head is left in there is because this is an abortion, not a medical procedure to save the woman. Death is the goal. The head must stay in otherwise the baby would be born. Health is not the reason these abortions occur–the desire for the baby to be dead is.

Prayer for the Nation

Posted on by

Abraham Lincoln“With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation’s wounds… to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”

– Abraham Lincoln

ACLU vs. Boy Scouts

Posted on by
Moonbats

Who does the ACLU think is more dangerous, homicide bombers or the Boy Scouts? Let’s take a look at several lawsuits the ACLU has filed recently.

First, the lawsuits against the Boy Scouts. The ACLU and lesbians are attacking the Boy Scouts in the 9th Circus.

An ACLU lawsuit on behalf of an agnostic, lesbian couple seeking to nullify the Boy Scouts’ long-standing lease with a San Diego park will be heard in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, widely regarded as the nation’s most liberal.

And that’s not the only problem the ACLU is causing for the Boy Scouts. Fear of ACLU lawsuits have forces Scouts to scrap troop charters.

Troops of Boy Scouts in Macomb County and around the country are scuttling their organizational charter agreements with local governments, fearing legal action from the American Civil Liberties Union for requiring allegiance to God.

Continue reading →

Mark of the Beast

Posted on by
Privacy

666! It’s starting. Next thing to come, companies requiring their employees to be “chipped.”

Firm implants ID chips

A small Walnut Hills operator of security cameras has re-ignited the international debate over microchips and privacy by implanting the chips into at least two employees.

Chief executive officer Sean Darks of CityWatcher.com said a doctor implanted the chips – about the size of a grain of rice – in his forearm several months ago and in the arm of another employee. He would not identify the other employee.

This is scary! Insertion of these chips is easy, but removing them requires surgery. There are some people who say this technology is not secure. It’s possible to read the signal coming from these devices and then “clone” the chip. If anybody ever tries to make me get one of these chips, I’ll refuse citing religious beliefs.

Continue reading →